monorail 加稅…還有退稅喔!

RTA (Sound Transit) 的汽車牌照稅也是可以退稅的. 如果你是住在 King, Pirece 和 Shonomish counties 的, 可以在報稅時申請退稅. 至於你付了多少, 可以到下面的連接尋找. —————————————– Panel OKs monorail car-tax increase to 1.4 percent 如果您住在西雅圖 City Limit, 又有車的話, 報稅的時候別忘了把汽車的 monorail tax 給報繳了. 因為 monorail tax 和 property tax 一樣是可以報退稅的. 尤其從今年六月後 monorail tax 就要由 0.85% 調高到 1.4%. 就是說 $20,000 元的車, 今年六月後 monorail tax 的汽車牌照稅就是 $280 元. 當然還有 $30 元的基本汽車牌照稅, 手續費, regional transit tax 等等加上去的. —————————————– 住在 King (Seattle), Pierce (Tacoma) 和 Snohomish (Everett) 三郡嗎? 你現在可以上網查查看你繳的汽車牌照稅有多少是給了大眾運輸系統.

冰上溜冰的地方

終於有一個華盛頓州室內冰上溜冰場列表. 如果無聊的話, 可以和朋友去溜冰場逛逛. 觀眾台上是朋友們聊天的好場所…尤其在炎熱的夏天. 這是個可以消暑的地方. Bellingham: Sportsplex Ice Arena, 360-733-9999, 1225 Civic Field Way, Bellingham Bremerton: Bremerton Ice Arena, 360-479-RINK (7465), 1950 Homer Jones Drive, Bremerton Everett: Comcast Ice Rink, 425-322-2650, 2000 Hewitt Ave., Everett Kent: Kent Valley Ice Centre, 253-850-2400, 6015 S. 240th St., Kent Kirkland: KingsGate Ice Arena, 425-823-1242, 14326 124th Ave. N.E., Kirkland Lynnwood: Lynnwood Ice Arena, 425-640-9999, 19803 68th Ave. W., Lynnwood Mountlake Terrace: Olympic View Ice Arena, 425-672-9012, 22202 70th Ave. W., Mountlake Terrace Renton: Castle Ice Arena, 425-254-8750, 12620 164th Ave. S.E., Renton Shoreline: Highland Ice Arena, 206-546-2431, 18005 Aurora Ave. N., Shoreline Tacoma: Puget Sound Hockey Center, 253-272-1757, 1918 Stewart St., Tacoma Tacoma: Sprinker Recreation Center & Ice Arena, 253-798-4000, 14824 C St. S., Pierce County Vancouver: Mountain View Ice Arena, (two rinks), 360-896-8700, 14313 S.E. Mill Plain Blvd., Vancouver, Wash. Wenatchee: Riverfront Park Ice Arena, 509-664-3392, 2 Fifth St., Wenatchee Yakima: Yakima Ice Arena, 509-248-6315, 1700 East Beech Street, Yakima 原始資料來自於 Seattle PI, 並加以增補.

西雅圖學區學校的水含鉛和鎘過高

有孩子在西雅圖的學區嗎? 記得注意一下學校提供的資訊. Seattle PI: Schools will bring in water —————————————– Seattle Public Schools will provide bottled water to about 70 schools after the winter break and test drinking water in all locations following an analysis initiated by a parent that showed high levels of lead and cadmium in drinking fountains. At a meeting last night, the board directed Superintendent Raj Manhas to undertake the testing and report back to the board by February with a plan on how to proceed with and fund any necessary repairs. “This is a critical health problem that we have to act upon,” said School Board member Dick Lilly. “We have to protect the health of kids.” John Vacchiery, the district’s director of facilities planning and enrollment, said the water testing would likely cost between $48,000 and $64,000. Providing drinking water to just 40 schools for a year, he said, would cost about $700,000. Vacchiery estimated it would cost roughly $10 million to replace galvanized iron pipes, a major source of lead contamination, in the 38 district schools built between 1900 and the 1960s. There are about 100 schools in the district. The issue arises at a crucial time for the district, which will put two major levies before voters in February. The board would have had to decide by tomorrow if it wanted to increase one of the levies to cover any water system repairs, but instead delayed a decision on how to pay for any remedial work. Manhas sent a memo to principals on Monday, acknowledging that the last comprehensive water testing and repairs at schools were done in the early 1990s and noted that the district has no consistent testing program in place. Public schools, with the exception of the few that have their own water source, such as a well, are not required by state or federal law to test their drinking water for contaminants. State standards are based on the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, passed in 1974 to regulate the country’s public drinking water supply. The act covers water suppliers such as Seattle Public Utilities but treats schools like private homes and other customers. Questions about drinking water quality came to light recently when Mark Cooper and Geoff Compeau, two parents who have children at Wedgwood Elementary School, began asking questions about the orange-colored water coming out of the school’s taps. Using reports of water testing done at the school a decade ago, Cooper and Compeau identified four fountains with lead levels exceeding the maximum allowable limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency. They took samples from the fountains last Friday and had them tested at a certified lab in Bothell. All four showed lead levels exceeding EPA limits of 20 parts per billion (ppb), and one of the four had cadmium levels higher than the 5 ppb EPA limit. One drinking fountain, located in a classroom, had lead levels 10 times over the limit. Cooper said he’s “outraged” at the district’s inattention to the problem, particularly since a 1993 district report recommended replacing all piping at four district schools – Wedgwood, Fairmount Park, Schmitz Park and Mann, which now houses NOVA alternative school. The report, which followed the comprehensive water tests, also recommended the district conduct random sampling to ensure lead levels stay within recommended levels and replace fixtures in fountains with lead levels over the limit. Vacchiery said to the best of his knowledge, the pipes at the four schools were not replaced. “I’m going to assume they were not,” he said. Vacchiery said there have been numerous facilities directors at the district since the early 1990s, he said, and he’s trying to determine at which schools repairs were done. Troy White, an environmental coordinator for the district, said additional water testing was done in 2000 and 2001, but it was limited to fewer than 400 samples at about 27 schools. Data released by the district appears to indicate that only one of the four schools cited in the 1993 report, Schmitz Park, was tested at that time. It showed lead levels over EPA limits in two fountains, one of them five times over the allowable limit. After 1993, there was a plan in place to flush water fountains on a regular basis to reduce lead levels, but Vacchiery said he didn’t know whether that plan was followed rigorously. Drinking fountains were replaced in many buildings, he said, but repairs “weren’t systematic.” In 1990, the district tested drinking water at 80 of its schools and facilities. At the time, it was determined that lead levels in drinking water “could be reduced significantly” by flushing the fountains periodically during the day. However, a staff report concluded that the best solution was to eventually replace the materials contributing to lead levels in the water. Elaine Packard, principal at NOVA, which was constructed in 1902, said her focus on water quality predates the district wide testing. “I knew that this building was old, and I knew that the pipes could have lead in them,” said Packard, who’s been at the school since 1974. For 15 years or more, she said, NOVA students and teachers have been supplied with bottled water “because I had committed to having drinking water we knew would be safe.” The school paid for the water from its own budget initially. Packard asked the district to test the water at least twice, she said. The water failed a lead-contamination test Packard estimated took place in the mid-1980s. Although the water fountains were shut off, sink taps remained on line, and district administrators urged her to flush the pipes by running the water for several minutes first thing in the morning. Fairmount principal Davy Muth, who’s been at the school since 1998, said she was not aware of any potential problems with the school’s water until district officials visited her yesterday and told her the water would be safe as long as custodians flushed the school fountains twice daily. Up to that point, Muth said, teachers and students drank the water. “We didn’t know any better.”